Aramayo Lab: People & Projects¶
The Aramayo Lab is an interdisciplinary research group in the Department of Biology at Texas A&M University. We integrate computational genomics, bioinformatics, and large language models to investigate molecular and evolutionary biology, with reproducibility as a core requirement throughout the research process.
Led by Rodolfo Aramayo, PhD, Associate Professor of Biology, the laboratory brings different biological questions together through a shared commitment to careful experimental reasoning, computational methods, and interpretable evidence.
Current graduate students¶
Graduate student
Brian White
Brian connects proteome-scale comparison with protein structure and dynamics. His work asks how sequence differences relate to the behavior of proteins as molecular systems.
Contribution to the lab. Extends the interpretation of protein variation from sequence scores toward structure, motion, and residue communication.
Explore Brian's projects
Graduate student
Julen Gamboa
Julen investigates how natural genomic variation among inbred mouse strains relates to circadian behavior. His work connects organism-level measurements to gene structure and regulatory architecture.
Contribution to the lab. Connects comparative genomics to phenotype while examining annotation quality, controls, and alternative explanations.
Explore Julen's projects
Former undergraduate researchers¶
These projects contributed distinct analyses to the laboratory's research program. Findings below apply to the datasets studied.
Former undergraduate researcher · 2025 thesis
Daniel Nguyen
Predicting iso-orthology for human CARS1 isoforms
Daniel developed an isoform-level comparative framework for human cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 1 and four nonhuman hominid species. His thesis identified conserved isoform-specific features and showed how incomplete annotations complicate orthology calls.
Methods and significance
He combined enhanced reciprocal-best-hit analysis with tissue-expression data, sequence alignment, coding-sequence comparison, and protein-domain annotation. The project moves comparative analysis beyond gene-level labels toward transcript and protein diversity. Proposed functional interpretations require experimental validation.
Former undergraduate researcher · Public poster
Joseph Gallucci
Auditing public next-generation sequencing submissions
Joseph audited 25 selected cancer-related human whole-genome datasets from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive. His work demonstrates why coverage and metadata need scrutiny before public data can support reproducible reanalysis.
Methods and findings
He extracted metadata and estimated coverage across sample runs in the randomly selected set. Eleven datasets exceeded 1× average coverage and six exceeded 4×. These findings describe the selected datasets and do not estimate the quality of the entire archive.
Former undergraduate researcher · Research poster
Mariana Fauteux
Highly conserved proteins across primate species
Mariana compared proteomes from 26 primate species and reported 50 highly conserved protein clusters in the selected data. Her project connects comparative sequence analysis to questions about evolutionary constraint.
Methods and findings
The analysis combined 100% sequence-identity and full-length-coverage clustering with proteome-completeness assessment and protein-domain annotation. Histones, ribosomal proteins, and other strongly constrained functions were prominent. The findings depend on the selected proteomes, their annotations, and the stated thresholds.
Mentoring and research culture¶
We practice biological reasoning, intellectual independence, reproducible workflows, and clear scientific communication. Students learn to turn public data and computational tools into an argument that distinguishes observations, interpretations, and hypotheses.
Ongoing studies and proposed analyses are labeled throughout these summaries. Public research records are linked where available.